Blue Sky No Sky thinking
Well, no Sky sponsorship for the all-conquering cycle team after next year. Perhaps not a huge surprise after Sky was taken over and recent questions raised over the team’s integrity – but all that seemed to have calmed down in recent months, with the overall image being boosted by Geraint Thomas’ Tour win, a man who appears to be really popular both in and outside the peloton.
In the current economic climate it’s hard to see anyone wanting to dig quite so deep into their pockets as Sky did so it will be interesting to see how the team cuts its cloth in rather less affluent times.
It looks like the British domination is more under threat now than it has been for years – I just hope that road cycling has gained a sufficiently strong support base here in the UK to withstand a possible period of lower success in the pro ranks. Surely we are not that shallow?
No doubt, Sky will be rushing to pass on the saving to subscribers (an academic point for me as we only have ‘proper’ television).
My own cycling for next year looks to be built around the White Horse Challenge on 28 April, and my usual week’s cycling out in the alps in July.
White Horse Challenge
I’ve entered the WHC again but with some apprehension as it’s only three weeks after the Rotterdam Marathon. I have no idea whether that’s enough time to recover from the run and then get back on the bike properly, but I guess I’ll find out. The WHC is about 90 miles with anywhere between 1400 and 1750m of climbing, depending whose Garmin you use.
This will be my 8th attempt and I’m still wanting to break the 5 hour mark – pb so far 5:05. I guess 2019 will not be the year to go under 5 hours, unless marathon training has some miraculous benefit to my cycling.
Haute Savoie, 2019
The alps trip is nearly finalised with all 6 of us being present and accounted for in 2019. I have no plans to ride out there like I did this year so I’m hoping I might perform better on the mountains than was the case with knackered legs this summer.
I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve been out there – it’s becoming a challenge for the routemeister, although I doubt I’ll ever get tired of the Col de la Colombière, the Plaine Joux, the Joux Plane and the Col de la Pierre Carrée (‘my’ Col having being the first, and still only, person to ‘everest’ it!).
Although it’s early in the training I was thinking about target setting for April’s marathon in Rotterdam.
Initially, my main aim was to break 4 hours, as I did (just) when I ran my two previous marathons in 1998 and 1999. However, the first four weeks of training are making me reassess that.
The current London Marathon ‘good for age’ for a 44 year old male is 3:05. I don’t suppose that’s changed much since I ran in 1999 as a 44 year old, but I was probably 50 minutes outside it then. Although I’ve kept reasonably fit through cycling over the last 8 years, what on earth makes me think that I might now be within 15 minutes of the ‘good for age’ time for me as a 63 year old?
I’ve never been particularly hung up on the age thing – but that doesn’t feel like a sound basis for ignoring it completely. I seem to have been assuming that I will run the same time as if the intervening 20 years just haven’t happened!
They might change but, for now, the targets are:
- Minimum target is to run all the way and finish without injury or undue trauma
- Beyond that, sub 4:15 is a realistic(?) target
- After that, sub 4:00 would be great
- Next, it would be setting a personal best – but that’s a tricky one because I cannot remember what time I did in my second marathon in 1999. My official finish time was 3:56:42 but I can’t remember whether that was an individual time or whether that was from the gun. In 1998 I got an individual finish time, but not start time, and I know that it had taken me nearly 9 minutes to get over the start line – but I can’t remember if that changed for 1999. Let’s say 3:56 will be a pb as I have no evidence for anything better than 3:56:42.
- The extreme wishful thinking would be 3:45 – my London Marathon ‘good for age’ time (though to me it feels way beyond just ‘good’).
The biggest factor will be staying fit, healthy and injury free (including the Achilles tendons) – but, even with all that working in my favour, 4:00 looks like much more of a stretch target than I’d assumed.
For the WHC, be ready to start early. Look for a group of guys, maybe a female or two, maybe ten deep. They won’t be the ridiculously fit people, the hammers, they’ll be a level down from that. That’s who you ride with. If you don’t see that group, leave ten minutes early and ride at your target pace, maybe a little above that pace. That group will pass you, maybe a few mph faster. Jump on the back of that group. When the group stops, you stop, but be ready to roll before they are so you don’t get left behind. Don’t forget, in the beginning, to introduce yourself and take your turns at the front. You’ll break your five hours no problem. 👍
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good sense. I almost got that group last year but the pace was a bit too hot for me. Perhaps the main question is how the legs react to the running training and the marathon itself. I’m wondering about some more aero wheels but I’m not sure I go fast enough for them to make a big difference.
You’re fast enough for 50’s. They make a HUGE difference. I (obviously) like Ican. Great wheel for the price. If they were just a touch too fast for you, 50’s would make that difference.
LikeLiked by 1 person
… perhaps Sky will be selling off some kit on the cheap …
Look for some wheels!
LikeLiked by 1 person